The long-run performance of initial
public offerings:
comparison between shari’ah and non
shari’ah-based firms
Abstract
This paper
empirically investigates the difference of the performance between shariah-based
and non shariah-based firms that listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX)
during the period July 2001 to December 2005. The results show that, when using
equally-weighted cumulative abnormal return (EW-CAR) and equally-weighted
buy-and-hold abnormal return (EW-BHAR), the long-run performance of IPOs return
between shariah and non shariah firms are significantly different. However, the
significance disappears when the returns are calculated with value-weighted
cumulative abnormal return (VW-CAR) and value-weighted buy-and-hold abnormal
return (VW-BHAR). Further, the results show that shariah-based firms outperform the market
in almost every month for two years, except month 7 and 10 when using VW-CAR.
However, non shariah-based firms underperform in almost each month.
Key words: long-run performance, IPO, shari’ah,
equally-weighted, value-weighted.
JEL
Classification: G1.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the academic
community has closely examined and intensely debated the performance of IPOs,
particularly in the long-run. The analysis of the long-run returns is directed
towards a methodological approach. Thus, Barber and Lyon (1997), Kothari and
Warner (1997), Brav and Gompers (1997), Fama (1998), Lyon, Barber and Tsai (1999), Loughran and
Ritter (2000), Gompers and Lerner (2003), Ang, Gu, and Hochberg (2005), and Ahmad-Zaluki, Campbell, and Goodacre (2007) have argued
that the method of performance measurement influences both the magnitude of the
abnormal returns as well as the size and power of the statistical test.
<< Download Jurnal >>
0 comments:
Post a Comment